View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 29, 2001, 03:32pm
rainmaker rainmaker is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
If the screener was moving backwards, away from contact, and the contact occurred anyway, it is definitely not a foul on him. Or if he was moving to protect himself from imminent danger, it's not a foul on him. Just because the body was moving, doesn't mean it's a moving screen.

This is another good reason to call the screener's foul an "illegal screen" instead of a "moving screen". It helps clear up confusion.
Reply With Quote