Tue May 16, 2006, 01:16pm
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mcrowder
While that logic holds specifically for a catcher and BR getting tangled, it is not true for ANY OTHER fielder / runner interaction. The FIELDER has right of way in fielding a batted ball. If PU feels that F2 was the fielder that should be protected in fielding this batted ball (as opposed to F1 or F5, for example), then F2 is afforded protection from a runner, including one charging from third. This sounds like interference to me.
|
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
|