Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
The first problem with this drivel is that he doesn't support his contention that the officiating in the women's game sucks. No evidence or even examples. Just his conclusion.
|
One might say he's asking for us to assume that conclusion, even if he didn't say it. Once we do that, he can then focus the article on that issue. To have to supply stats about why women's officiating sucks would be boring to most readers. Besides, in the end, it is just his opinion. He also did say that the officiating on the men's side sucks as well.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
Then, he asserts that the only reason women are even playing sports is because of Title 9. That suggests he doesn't think that, without the government's help, women wouldn't be capable of organizing and playing on their own. That contridicts his idea that women can and in fact do good work officiating (or playing).
|
I don't know what Title 9 says, but take a quick poll amongst yourself, family, and friends. If in that poll women's athletics are watched more than men's athletics, I bet that group's viewing statistics are in the minority. People in general watch male athletics more than female athletics. I think this is consistent whether or not T9 was in place. I don't see the contradiction you mention.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
To top that off, he wants the officials that, in his words, suck, to be calling the men's game as well, guessing that they won't suck if they call men's.
|
Are you not assuming that the ability required for any men's game is higher than all women's games. If so, is this true? I dunno.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
He wants Ed Hightower, Ted Valentine, and Tim Higgins to work a primo women's game, yet, he'll scream like hell that Dee Kantner isn't working that game instead of one of the men. But I thought Dee Kantner sucked, since she's already working women's.
|
I think you are stretching here.