My reply from etz
I've got to restate this for my own clarity.
R1, R2, R3. Score 9-7. O has 7. 1 out.
R1, R2, R3 cross home. BR tagged out between 1st and 2nd for the 2nd out.
R2 is appealed for missing 3B. R2 declared out on appeal for the 3rd out.
R2's score is nullified.
R3's score is nullified (ASA 5-3-B-3 2005 book; 2006 book is at home).
Protest rejected.
Mike R, why is this not correct?
--------
After I posted the above on etz, I noticed Mike's reply that he was focused on the force aspect.
__________________
Tom
|