As reprehensible as the player's actions were, a ruled forfeit of the game does not strike me as the appropriate penalty.
A forfeit is the appropriate penalty when a team is either unable to (e.g., insufficent eligible players to field a team) or refuses to continue playing the game. That's not what happened here.
One player on the team had what borders on a psychotic episode.
If it were up to me, the player would be suspended for at least the remainder of the season.
If I were his parent, I would have him tested for steroid (and other drug) abuse. The behavior strikes me as symptomatic of "roid rage".
If I were his coach, he would be off the team. Period.
JM
Last edited by UmpJM; Sun Apr 02, 2006 at 02:08pm.
|