Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rockyroad
Nope, nope, nope...you're wrong and I'm right. That's just the way it is...
Seriously, I really didn't have that big a problem with the original call. Just bothers me that the rule requires contact and ,regardless of what semantics might be brought in, there was no contact...did the penalty fit the offense - yes, just don't think it was handled properly by rule. As far as the game management aspect of it, it was perfect...
|
I realize that I am not always right (as hard as it is to accept that....). I just think that you have to work pretty hard to argue/justify that contact did not occur in this situation. This play and the Intentional T (dead ball + contact) given to a Charlotte player near the end of their game vs. George Washington (3/4) and they way each was administered was certainly a learning exprience for me. I know I'll be ready for this situation if it occurs next year!