Thread: interference
View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 24, 2006, 12:56pm
David Emerling David Emerling is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctblu40
David- your ruling on play #1 is incorrect. The runner in this case, if not retired by the catchers throw, is always sent back to first, never called out. The reason being is that B1's interference did not prevent a double play as he didn't strike out.
The correct ruling would be- B1 out for interference, R1 back to first.
You're right!

I was thinking of something else and I drifted.

Thanks for the correction.

Disregard my previous post

Or, as Emily Litella (Gilda Radner) used to say, "Nevermind!"

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Reply With Quote