View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 19, 2006, 12:39pm
UMP25 UMP25 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally posted by nickrego
The R2 did not Intentionally let the ball hit him, so there was NO Interference.
Yes, there WAS interference, whether R2 intentionally let the ball hit him or whether it accidentally hit him. It still is interference. You're thinking that interference has to be some sort of intentional act. While that can occur in many situations, of course, I submit to you that most interferences are unintentional; yet they're still interferences nonetheless.
Reply With Quote