Thread: FED reasoning
View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 15, 2006, 05:01pm
mcrowder mcrowder is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
And we have the opposite. Our association (Texas) points to the "there is no additional penalty" part of the similar (but not identical) caseplay, and tells us that the intended penalty for a glove that is illegal for PITCHING is "fix it or remove it", even if said glove is used for fielding. The 3-base award is (in their opinion, and thusly my opinion) intended for the use of a glove that is illegal for FIELDING purposes actually being used while fielding.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote