Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
FTs were attempted, so Ts were definitely charged. I have to assume that the actions were deemed a false double technical foul.
Having watched the play numerous times on replay, I don't concur with that decision. A double tech was the obvious call. Duke #3 made contact with BC #11 and he responed by shoving Duke #3. Why the false?
|
If you don't think that this situation fits the defintion of the false double technical, well, then, wow.
You answered your own question. If the narrative of two unsporting events includes the word "then," then it's a false double, and both teams shoot. Where's the problem?