[SAump]

"A) unwilling to believe that spin curves a ball, B) insists that because a ball thrown fast from 3rd to 1st doesn't appear to be affected by gravity, that it is in fact not affected by gravity, or C) believes the earth is 8000 years old in the face of overwhelming evidence otherwise."

A) WRONG! Please find any reference in this thread where I discuss that I am unwilling to believe that spin curves a BALL at low velocity. I wrote that almost anybody (15 million men or more) can throw a 70 mph curve ball. You FAIL.

B) WRONG! Please find any reference in this thread where I discuss that I am unwilling to believe that a fastball thrown below 90 mph will NOT RISE! I clearly stated that my calculations require 93 mph, 96 mph or 98 mph or MORE. To be sure, within a certain statistical degree of certainty, I have always written about a 100 mph or greater fastball. But all my hard work was DELETED. YOU Sir, FAIL again.

C) WRONG! Please find any reference in this thread where I discuss that the earth is only 8000 years old. This was strictly an absurd comment to make by ANY SCIENTIST or credible person. I think you confuse my reference to MODERN (MAN) CIVILIZATIONS, written communication, etc. I can only imagine why someone fell in tune with your version of of a 100 mph EVOLUTION. SIR, you FAIL miserably.

McPhysics, batting 0 for 3 again. I don't believe you wasted your money on education. I really believe you should spend some more of your money trying to find it again. Is there anything in my writing that you do understand?