Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
Next on Jerry Springer, "When Trolls Collide - the seedy underbelly of Troll arguments"
Let them ramble on, guys, this is going no where. You can't convince someone who is A) unwilling to believe that spin curves a ball, B) insists that because a ball thrown fast from 3rd to 1st doesn't appear to be affected by gravity, that it is in fact not affected by gravity, or C) believes the earth is 8000 years old in the face of overwhelming evidence otherwise.
Let it die.
|
As I suspected you lack character as well as an ability to think critically.
If you maliciously and purposefully misquoted me have the cohunnas to admit it. Talk about losing credibility, if you can't even quote a post on the officials forum correctly how can we believe your interpretation of physics, perhaps you're misquoting Newton as well.
Also, you and CJ play fast and loose with your terminology:
"scientific fact" and "overwhelming evidence"
Last I heard big bang is a theory, evolution is a theory and it is impossible to prove the accuracy of carbon dating.
Since you are the resident "expert" in physics, can you please tell us all the difference between scientific theory and fact.
I suggest you pull out your high school freshman science book and read it over a few times so as to avoid misquoting.