Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
This is so wrong.
|
We have
at least 2 topics going in this thread... one being the quality (if you will) of the test question, which, as I said, I think is a marvelous test question. Just the right about of information lacking to require the umpire taking the test to actually think about it and consult the rule book.
The other is the "fairness" of the ASA ruling in the various expanded scenarios. You have a point. But, the rulebook at this point is what it is on this play.
Quote:
So... a ball that WOULD HAVE BEEN foul (however you wish to describe it) had it been either caught or allowed to land
|
I know, but I can't just let this go... maybe I'm OCD or something... if it was caught, it would not be foul.