Thu Feb 23, 2006, 12:10pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SamIAm
Quote:
Originally posted by M&M Guy
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
I got a complementary pass to a health & fitness club for B1, who apparently needs some strength training.
|
Aw, come on Dan, quit being so artificial...
I'm a little uncomfortable with calling the foul on B1 solely because he doesn't have "legal guarding position". That would have no bearing on whether that player commited a foul in this case, just as it has no bearing on whether or not a foul could be commited against him. If there is a foul, B1 would have to initiate contact that puts A1 at a disadvantage. It could be argued rather easily that A1 initiated the contact (clamping down on the arm) that put B1 at a disadvantage. So I'm with Chuck - "Let go!"
For those that are willing to call the foul on B1, what would you say if, as A1 clamps down on the arm, A1 pivots hard, swinging B1 around through the air and throwing him to the ground. Would you still have a foul on B1?
As far as the fans yelling for the "reach", I give them just as much credability as the ones that yell for "over the back".
|
Yep, foul on B1, then T, maybe flagrant T, on A1 for dead ball activity.
|
Sam, do you like green eggs and...er...never mind.
Just curious as to why you would have a foul on B1 in this original sitch?
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.
(Used with permission.)
|