View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 20, 2006, 01:44pm
Rich's Avatar
Rich Rich is offline
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Re: Re: Mr. DeNucci:

Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by IdahoRef
You've seen the games where the final score is 5-8. Don't you think the shot clock would be better than stalling? I understand that "stalling" is part of the game, but it's a part of the game that makes this great game of basketball boring and in my opinion a long shot clock would help. Thanks for your thoughts.


I would guess that there are a between one million and two million basketball games (boys' and girls'; jr. H.S. and H.S.) played in Canada and the United States each school year using NFHS rules. How many end up with scores like 8-5? Not enough to worry about whether the rules need a shot clock.

MTD, Sr.
I've seen one score all season in WI where the losing team was in single digits. And it had NOTHING to do with lack of a shot clock.

I want nothing to do with a shot clock. We have enough timer issues as it is. On a tangential note, I also want nothing to do with stopping the clock on a made basket anytime in the game. Again, we have enough timer issues as it is.

--Rich
Reply With Quote