View Single Post
  #52 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 09, 2001, 07:33pm
Self Self is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 130
Mark What about Rule2 Art 3

We now have:

1.)The Head Rules Examiner for IAABO Roger MacTavish.
2.)Assistant Directer/NFHS Interpreter Mary Shruckhoff.
3.)Executive Committe/Ga. IAABO rules interpreter Dean Ericson.
4.) IAABO Secretary/ SE rules clinician Ray McClure.
5.) Still waiting from numerous others.

All agreeing could it not be that they are saying that a game cannot continue as such and per rule 3 article 2 we issue a warning after such violation that a technical will follow if the team persists making this violation, that it is to making an atrocity of the game by ignoring the rules?

I agree it is a violation, but I also could see this is making a mockery/atrocity of the game and you could use this rule if it continued. What do you think?
Reply With Quote