View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 15, 2006, 10:52pm
BigUmp56 BigUmp56 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
I would have nothing to defend, Windy. I've stated over and over that there is no call to make in the original play unless there was intent on the part of the batter-runner to interfere. You've been shown definitive rulings that sustain the idea that intent is a requirement. You see intent, and I don't in the play at hand.



PWL:

You just get worse and worse and worse..............


Tim.
Reply With Quote