[drinkeii]

Originally posted by SeanFitzRef
As a person, I am one of the biggest basketball fans in the world. I go to games all over the Chicago area to watch good HS, college, and pro (now that the Bulls are at least trying to field competitive teams). B

ut as an official (which I am now known), I have to watch the games in silence, only cheering good plays or remarking on bad coaching moves and the lack of solid fundamentals. When I observe something of note, I make a mental note to ask the question later. How can any official question another's judgement? Judgement is just that, making several decisions in a split second. Soccer isn't like this. swimming isn't like this. Football, baseball, etc. The only sport that comes close is hockey.

As a basketball official, you, DRinkeII, should know that every call you make or don't make can be called into question. I agree that mechanics, court location, signals, ball hawking are all things that can be addressed without question. But judgement on a blarge in live action??? Calling or no-calling a borderline travel?? If you have a rooting interest, there is no way that you can see this objectively. Let the officials on the court handle their game, and give solid, constructive criticism during half-time, after the game, or in meetings. But take it the same way you give it.

I have never had any problem accepting criticism - except from those who will not accept it themselves (I've never agreed with hypocrits). I am very willing to have things pointed out - and I always tell my partner that if he sees something that means I completely kicked a call, come over and correct me... i'd rather get the call right than choose to not correct it because I don't want to look bad - i think i look worse if I mess up and no one fixes it.