[SAump]

The correct NFHS rule citation was first given by PWL on PAGE 2. Why didn't you post the NCAA/NFHS rulings when I asked back on page 7 in Why Windy WHyy? I thought the tune would sound like something PWL would write. Don't tell me you two agree on somthing, then PEACE among you and the other namecallers. Now you want to twist my words about stealing around as well. Stop rubbin it, you look foolish and I cannot control my laughter from the stands.

You did say that you said it all along and I agree that You, DG and others have ruled intereference from the beginning. I am also sure that many others stayed out along the sidelines because they already knew the RIGHT CALL. But there was controversy over the correct interference ruling interpretation; such as 6.05 h, batter/runner, intent or not, inside/outside of batter's box, and holding or throwing the bat. I am still not sure the correct ruling will hold up under proper scrutiny for all leagues or levels of play over time.

DG had the judgment and balls to lay it on the line and I did tip my hat off to him and Bob J. for their fine interpretations. It made me look it up the 2006 NCAA rulebook and there it was in black and white, 8-5-o. SO come on down from the clouds. No wonder it was an easier call for the bigger boys. I hope NFump, SDS and I made us all think about the NFHS topic in depth as well. At least I know the proper rule citation.