View Single Post
  #80 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2006, 04:14pm
carolinaRRREF carolinaRRREF is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally posted by OverAndBack
And you're good at making stuff up.

And refusing to do anything but go blindly along with the lemmings who always look for a conspiracy behind every loss.

OPI - good call.
TD - debateable call.
Hold - good call.
BBTW - still haven't seen it, can't say.

If you want to debate calls, fine - that's what sports is about. But if you're going to get hysterical and say the game was ruined by the officiating and that it's national outrage and anyone who doesn't believe with your made-up bullsh** is an apologist or a poor excuse for an official, then you've crossed the line.

I've got facts. You've got hysteria. Which one makes for the better argument?
you have numbers, but calling something a "good call" is not a fact. It's an opinion -- one shared by the vast minority of America.

I'm not saying anything about a conspiracy. I don't believe anybody was paid off or intentionally biased (although I guess that's possible, I don't THINK that's the case). I just believe the game was officiated poorly, and the people here are defending the refs because they're defensive about everybody saying how bad they were, instead of considering the possibility that their heros in the NFL had a bad game. And that shallow-mindedness, I believe, is a very bad trait for somebody calling a game to have.