Quote:
Originally posted by cmathews
Quote:
Originally posted by hooper
Quote:
Originally posted by cmathews
Ok I have had the opportunity to look at the film in slow motion over and over and over...I whole heartedly support the holding and the OPI, no doubt in my mind. The Big Ben TD, inconclusive evidence to overturn whichever call had been made in my opinion...Great Big Kudos to the boys, the hold and OPI were made at full speed, not the slow mo we get to see, and they nailed em....congrats boys, for a job pretty darned well done.
|
What's that... ah... march of the yes men.
We'll agree to disagree.
|
you obviously no nothing about me which is not surprising since we have never met...I am as far from a yes man as it gets...with that said, evidently we will agree to disagree, as is the case most of the time with fanboys...
|
"fanboys" - that clearly shows you know nothing about me either. The rest of the officials in the country and I will continue to take an honest look at a game that had many, many errors in it. You can look away if you like.
The actual problem here is not about who won the SuperBowl or how it was officiated, the issue is what changes need to be made to make the officials more accurate. Perhaps camera angles from above the field for replays. Perhaps full-time officials who are paid full-time wages. Perhaps additional officials on the field. Or off-field officials always reviewing the replays. Or rules changes/clarifications. Now THAT'S an interesting discussion to have!
[Edited by hooper on Feb 7th, 2006 at 01:30 PM]