Quote:
Originally posted by imaref
Rich....
Thanks for saying what has to be said!
My partners and I were discussing the Hernandez story the other night on our way to our game. We're what the article referred to as "older" officials. We like to be classified as "veteran" or "seasoned" officials. Our "3-Crew", between us have 94 years of service at all levels from pee-wee to college. We work very hard to maintain our fitness level because we know and understand that the game, indeed has gotten faster. None-the-less, we feel very comfortable that we can compete with the best of the crews & teams out there. We are also of the opinion that we will gladly leave the avocation the moment we feel unable to do the job for the players.....isn't that the primary reason for our work?
I'm sure you agree with me, Rich, that "we" are in a generation of people who want the spotlight before earning it with hardwork, commitment and "learning the craft" at the lower levels and eventually moving up. I am also proud to say that I have served as a mentor for several talented young people who have gone on to earn the right to work the State Tournament. That's my thanks.....because I did something that made a difference!
The Hernandez story was so limited on facts and made some really erroneous assumptions and generalities. I know you have worked hard and paid your dues in getting the schedule you have! And that's to your credit. Us "veteran" officials should not be ignored by the "new" thinking that you can climb the ladder without the work! I agree that new officials need more opportunities....but, you need to make those opportunities by developing a good work ethic and committing yourself to getting noticed! Our crew has always been receptive to mentoring young officials into a rotation with us so they can experience the "Games of Consequence"....but, I'll be hell bent to take on someone in our crew who isn't committed to working hard and putting in the time to earn the opportunities that come with their hardwork!
"end of editorial".....now I'll shut up!
|
Part of what I failed to mention was that I had 15 years of experience before moving here. That probably greased the skids a bit with the local commissioners. Regardless, I had to make the contact with them.
I've taken on one of the 7-to-10 year officials and have worked a number of games with him the past few seasons, offering him pointers about moving up and being aggressive. Earlier this season, I talked to him and found out he's gotten a regular partner and a 20-game schedule this season. It's about attitude and mindset. You've hit the nail on the head, wl.
Why should veteran officials who work hard be punished? Since when should youth and inexperience trump veteran knowledge and experience?
Everyone is pointing out the person who should pack it in and the person who can't run the floor, but this "movement" is going to catch good, solid, veteran officials.
Why? Because those doing the evaluating during the games (for the most part) have very little idea what makes a good official. Many commissioners are not officials, but principals and athletic directors. Many of the evaluations are coming from coaches and the evaluations vary depending on who won the game.
I have a game tonight. 2-person. Boys varsity. In 2006. It's a sorry state of affairs when a lot of people think that the 3rd official is a waste in a game that is likely to be very fast paced. Unfortunately, I've seen all too frequently that officials are seen as the necessary evil. In other words, they'd hire one if they could get away with it.