Quote:
Originally posted by Gmoore
Of all the question they could have put on the test about erasing lines they just had to choose that play.. Can't understand the logic
|
Since the test is not only open book, but open discussion, I have assumed the test has the primary objective of requiring the umpire to re-aquaint himself/herself with the book.
In that light, a question where you have to consider a situation that is less than obvious will have you think about not only the rule, but the enforcement of the rule. That makes this an excellent question on the erasing the lines rule.
That, and the other primary objective of the NFHS test... nobody scores 100%!
