View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 30, 2006, 07:21am
Skarecrow Skarecrow is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Layton, Utah
Posts: 109
I agree with all that it is intent #1, but I don't believe that situation #3, taunting, can fit in the definition of Article 1--there is no striking--therefore, you cannot have a flagrant fighting rule....striking is required....
__________________
I love to mate.....Chess, The Kings Game
Reply With Quote