Thread: 4 flagrants
View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 25, 2006, 09:27am
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
That was my partner's contention and that is why we charged the flagrant. However, we both agreed that if B1 hadn't hit him, A1's T would not have been flagrant. His shove just didn't rise to the level of violent or savage.

The opponent committed the violent act.

It doesn't seem right to me to make the penalty depend upon the actions of the opponent. I'm really struggling with that.

Reply With Quote