[QUOTE]
Originally posted by David Emerling
Quote:
|
So, what you're saying is this: The out on BR stands (for failing to touch first) and the fact that he was a victim of catcher's interference does not allow the umpire to invoke that penalty and AWARD him 1st. Is this what you're saying?
|
Dave, the catcher's interference obviously didn't stop the batter from striking the ball successfully, did it? He was able to obtain 2nd base!!!
Please explain to me...............
- What did the catcher's interference have to do with the runner missing 1B??
- Did the catcher prevent BR from touching 1B?
- Why should the BR NOT have to touch 1B?
Freix