Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
Quote:
Originally posted by canuckrefguy
Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
If this play originated from the T/C area, then to me it becomes more difficult to accept your partners' opinions on this call. One or both of them should have been watching the matchup between A1 and B1. That would make it more difficult for them to really know whether B2 had position or not. I could be wrong, they had a much wider angle. But if it was that close it seems they would have had to be watching B2 before A1 got past B1 in order to know for sure. And it sounds to me like they shouldn't have been.
|
The way Larks described it, it sounds like the play originated from C, otherwise he wouldn't have been in close-down. I actually think T might have had a decent look at whether B2 slid in or not, depending on how crowded it was in the paint.
|
It sounded like it came from the top down the nearer lane line to me, so that is trail's primary.
|
On second look, it does appear as if dribbler is coming down the lane line on L's side.
Question isn't about primary - secondary defender was Larks' call all the way. Question seems to be about vision and positioning.
Regardless, I think we've discussed everything by now.