View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 14, 2000, 10:42am
PublicBJ PublicBJ is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 124
Post

quote:
Originally posted by Matthew on 02-13-2000 09:21 PM
That was not a backcourt violation, with the information you have given us



Sorry, think you're wrong. Since the ball bounced in the backcourt, the ball had backcourt status. Using the three-points principle (two feet + ball) to determine frontcourt/backcourt status, once the player touched that ball, he was in backcourt. Violation.

If the ball hadn't bounced in backcourt first, then he would still have frontcourt status when he touched the ball (while airborne).

------------------
Brian Johnson
Reply With Quote