Quote:
Originally posted by Daryl H. Long
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Daryl H. Long
|
I believe the NF makes mistakes in their printed material and will call them on it when I see it. If you don't belive the NF makes mistakes then read 3.4.15 Situation A on page 3 of the 05-06 NF Case Book. The ruling is WRONG. The correct ruling is A1 is a PLAYER and he alone gets the T. his status as a player does not change just because it is halftime.
|
The ruling is wrong and DFaryl H. Long is right?
You really ought to read the rule book more often, Daryl.
And whatintheheck does "halftime" have to do with anything? Halftime isn't mentioned in the statement on p.3 of the case book or anywhere in the actual case play. [/B]
|
Thank you for such an eloquent dissertation on why the NF Ruling is correct on page 3 of case book for 3.14.15 situation B. I agree wholeheartedly. Perhaps it is YOU who needs to read more carefully.
I said 3.4.15 Sit A is incorrect.
I said 3.4.15 Sit A is incorrect.
I said 3.4.15 Sit A is incorrect.
On second thought I will type it here for you.
[/B][/QUOTE]Oh my. I see the problem now. I also admit that I was wrong, withdraw my remarks above and hang my head in abject shame.
Now, having said that, Houston we have a problem. I've never noticed this before; the FED makes COMMENTS every year on page 3 about various case book plays. Personally I usually skim over those maybe once and then forget about them. Well. I'm gonna have to stop doing that. None of the case book plays showing on page 3 actually show up later on in the case book. Not a one of 'em. If you study the body of the case book , you won't find them. The only place that you'll find them is on page 3. I was citing 3.4.15 back to you- which is the
only 3.4.15 that is actually inside the case book.
Thank you for bringing that to my attention, Daryl.