View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 13, 2005, 12:54pm
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Whistles & Stripes
Quote:
Originally posted by tomegun
Wow, this is a new one for me; I don't think I've ever heard someone say teachers AREN'T underpaid. During the school year, they are with kids more than the kids own parents are unless you count being with the kids when they are sleep. Even during summer break the parents aren't with the kids much because a lot of parents work. How can someone who is with your kids that much only be worth $40,000 (what I've heard they make in Maryland)? That is under $4,500 a month if you go by 9 months. There are so many other jobs that could be cut, or not given the annual raise, that it is ridiculous. That money could be added to all these teachers' salaries.
And using your logic, that is an annualized salary of about $53,000. SOunds reasonable to me. Like I said before, work 9 months, get 9 months worth of pay.
Well, no, it's an annual salary of $40,000.

Teachers are not paid per hour or week or month. They are paid a salary in exchange for rendering a service over the course of the school year which happens to be 9 or 10 months. To "annualize" their compensation over the full year is...well...ignorant.
Reply With Quote