View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 11, 2005, 07:24am
Jurassic Referee Jurassic Referee is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
Bench personnel entering without permission is an indirect on the coach.
Quite true, but this technical foul does not fall under the bench personnel group.
Here's why:

If this happened after a TO or intermission, then the kid is still one of the five players legally in the game and his returning is a team technical foul according to 10.1.9.
If a different kid comes onto the court, we have a substitute technical foul for either not reporting to the scorer or not being beckoned by an official.

Either way, the head coach does not receive an indirect T per the chart on page 73.

If this happened after another dead ball, then the precise call is less clear due to the change to 10-3-3. I would likely call the T under the new 10-3-3 or 10-3-7. I don't believe that I could justify a team technical here.
Therefore, this one is a player technical foul and the head coach still doesn't receive an indirect T per the chart.

That part of 10-3-3 hasn't changed at all, Nevada. They removed the part pertaining to "leave the court for an unauthorized reason" but they left in the part applicable to this play- "delay return after being legally OOB", The relevant case book play hasn't changed either- 10.3.3SitB. The player returning late gets a "T". Giving an indirect "T" to the head coach is not a part of the penalty listed for the articles in R 10-3.
Reply With Quote