Quote:
Originally posted by Ed Hickland
Quote:
Originally posted by cw3Retired
Two thoughts:
1. Most "shotgun" formations I have seen in H.S. have the QB only 5 yards back. A formation of this type would NOT afford the center protection under this rule.
2. I have had one instance where the holder on a try for point only lined up 5 yards back. Again, no protection. Just because the team lines up for a kick, it doesn't mean you can forget the 7-yard requirement.
|
The 7-yard requirement is a statement of the rule, the true interpretation is the long snapper is given protection because of the position he is in from being roughed.
In the case where the holder lines up 5 yards, protect yourself and let him know he really needs to move back. But if in your opinion the long snapper was roughed I would still give the penalty.
Splitting hairs or more appropriately counting blades of grass should not be the absolute for rule enforcement. What if the holder was 6-1/2 yards back, would you not protect the snapper?
Remember, Federation rules are balanced toward safety and as an official you are doing your duty by doing whatever is reasonably possible to protect players from undo harm.
|
While I would consider myself as much a coach as an official, I would NEVER tell the holder to back up two yards to protect MYSELF. And there is a BIG difference between 5 yards and 6 1/2 yards. That is NOT splitting hairs.
The 7 yard requirement is there for a reason. What is that reason? Beats me, I didn't write the rule. But I do have to follow and enforce them.
BTW, just because the center is not afforded direct protection by rule, doesn't give the defense the right to pile drive him. As an umpire, even in the short shotgun, I still look out for the center.