View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 02, 2005, 08:03pm
SanDiegoSteve SanDiegoSteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally posted by WhatWuzThatBlue
I think I'm going to need more than one Heineken tonight.

So let me get this straight...you were arguing for the sake of arguing? All of us understand the ambiguity of the rules, but you made this your Alamo. We tried to tell you what should be called and even provided the ruling. Now you claim that you would penalize the coach?




Honey, do we have anything stronger than Heineken? Bring me the Jack, please.
You provided a ruling which does not apply to the situation. 10-2-3 may, but that is up to the individual umpire who is making then call. 5-1-2 does not address the situation directly.

Pour me a shooter of that Jack while you're at it.

Of course I am going to call the runner out. I am not the only umpire who responded that the rules have no provision for this situation. Others did as well. You said "we" tried to tell "you" blah, blah....No, you tried to tell me. I was only pointing out that there existed no rule addressing the play of which you asked for opinions. 5-1-2 does not cover it, so quit trying to make it fit in this case. 10-2-3(g) is the only rule you can fall back on for this kind of TWP (you might see this play all the time, but I never have.)
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote