|
WWTB - From the response that the original poster has made, it would seem that it was not I that misread the post. It was NOT about closed threads.
As for the history between you and Carl, that is irrelevent. My comment was "from what I've seen." Nothing more. The history involved does not apply.
Presumptuous, yes. You took a generic post and assumed it was meant for you. Where as I saw someone griping about the "good" threads going down the toilet with name calling, and condescending attitudes. I think the song says, "You're so vain, you probably thing this song is about you..."
I do not feel inferior to you. But from the other replies on this thread, it appears that I have not taken a personal offense to your methods. It seems more that several dislike your condescending manner. Take or leave it, that's just you.
I saw no mightier than thou attitude in your reply to me. However, the strong defense told me that the comments may have struck a nerve.
I look forward to debates with you that actually pertain to baseball. If you can debate from experience and rules knowledge, I think there could be some room for education.
I think this thread about pointless threads has gotten pointless.
Darien
|