Quote:
Originally posted by Texas Aggie
>>casebook 9.1.6 A (b)..is similar, but the free trow shooter steps on the free throw line while releasing the throw. Ruling is double violation..go to AP<<
This seems inconsistent with CB 9.1.9 Situation B (b) where B1 was in the lane and A2 committed basket interference. According to the ruling, A1 is giving a "substitute throw", which is how we did it.
This needs further clarification, because I agree that the first case play indicates it should be AP, but the one I posted here indicates the A violation is ignored.
Incidentally, other than in passing, ignore disconcertion. We didn't have that.
|
In 9.1.9Bb, the violation by A2 is most certainly NOT ignored. If the FT had gone in, A2's contact would have canceled the score. However, since B1 also violated it must also be penalized....substitute throw.
This is not unlike a player getting fouled while shooting and then having goaltending or basket interferenece on the shot. The points will be awarded or canceled depending on who committed the GT or BI. Also, the shooter will get 1 shot if the points were awarded or two if canceled.