Quote:
Originally posted by joseph2493
Quote:
Originally posted by Texas Aggie
>>casebook 9.1.6 A (b)..is similar, but the free trow shooter steps on the free throw line while releasing the throw. Ruling is double violation..go to AP<<
This seems inconsistent with CB 9.1.9 Situation B (b) where B1 was in the lane and A2 committed basket interference. According to the ruling, A1 is giving a "substitute throw", which is how we did it.
|
The difference is who made the violation...
|
Joseph, that's not correct. The difference between Aggie's play and the case play is not who made the violation; but rather, the kind of violation. In Aggie's play, both violations are free throw violations. But in the case play, one of the violations is basket interference, which is
not a free throw violation. So A2's BI merely ends the FT; and since we had a delayed violation for B1, a replacement throw is awarded.