Quote:
Originally posted by Texas Aggie
>>casebook 9.1.6 A (b)..is similar, but the free trow shooter steps on the free throw line while releasing the throw. Ruling is double violation..go to AP<<
This seems inconsistent with CB 9.1.9 Situation B (b) where B1 was in the lane and A2 committed basket interference. According to the ruling, A1 is giving a "substitute throw", which is how we did it.
This needs further clarification, because I agree that the first case play indicates it should be AP, but the one I posted here indicates the A violation is ignored.
Incidentally, other than in passing, ignore disconcertion. We didn't have that.
|
The difference is who made the violation...if the second violation occurs by the offense from one of the lane spaces then you give the shooter a second free throw...if the violation occurs anywhere else on the court it's a double violation (unless you believe that the first violation caused the second)