View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 27, 2005, 10:44pm
BigUmp56 BigUmp56 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56

I would agree with that assesement for the most part. With that being said, *if* the runner tripped on the bag as a result of the obstruction, I still feel the runner should be avanced to at least third without regard to the interference.

I realize this is reading more into the play than what was initially presented, but in order to actually rule on this play, one would have to see it unfold to be sure.

At least that's how I see it.

Tim.
Reply With Quote