Quote:
Originally posted by BigUmp56
Ummmmm Steve,
Pete did say he had a law degree and that he taught pre-law.
On to the association issue.
For those of you that work games in an asociation that will not assign at least a two man crew:
I now have a better understanding of where you're coming from. I still don't understand why you took my opinions so personal.
I said nothing insulting about your particular association, it's members or yourself. My comments were, and still are my opinion on what I feel is not a good policy.
If you feel it's a good policy then that's your right. I have the right to feel otherwise. Because I disagree with President Bush's policies, does not mean I'm insulting you when I say he's an idiot, does it?
None of you have said that you feel rookies working solo is a good policy. You've only said that's what your stuck with for various reasons. Have you ever considered discussing this with the officers of your association? You may find out they feel the way I do, but are simply unable to effect change.
Tim.
|
Tim,
If I worked for the Bush administration, I would take your remarks personally. If I were say, Dick Cheney, yeah, I'd be pissed at you. Most people identify with their particular organization. They often remain loyal to their association, even when others jump around to different ones. When you insult associations that assign solo games, you are insulting its members by proxy. Can you now see how that is taken personally?
Yes Tim, we all think one-man is not the ideal situation. And the leaders of our associations feel the same way, I'm sure. Who doesn't think two is better than one? Three's better than two, but we don't refuse to work games because the schools only want two, do we? We all found out that six is too many.
Steve
[Edited by SanDiegoSteve on Nov 22nd, 2005 at 09:33 AM]