View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 02, 2001, 05:02pm
Camron Rust Camron Rust is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Re: Prefacing this with... You had to be there....

Quote:
Originally posted by williebfree
P.S. Camron... What "label" do you suggest to replace "intentional"?.... Retaliation???? Just curious.

I think that the excessive contact part should be seperated from the intentional foul to become a seperate foul...perhaps a "hard foul". Same penalty and definitions (broken into two). It would eliminate the notion that it always has to be intentional to be an intentional foul.

I can't think of a good name for the remaining part (or at least one that would be understood). It could be a tangential foul, a nonsense foul , a water fowl, ...better stop now before I get too silly.....too late.
Reply With Quote