Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Jeff,
While it is not defined in the book, I've always understood a simultaneous violation to be two players committing violations at approximately the same time, and a double violation was two opponents violating one after the other.
|
Nope, that's a gangbang, by definition. It's somewhere in rule 4.
|
Wait.
Isn't a gangbang an example of multiple players violating a single opponent?
|
No, if there's a time frame between the acts, then that's a false multiple gangbang. That was on the iAABO exam last year.
|
Sigh. This stuff is so confusing.