This is not an unmerited FT.
The original FT was properly awarded for a foul of some kind. Whether or not the violation call that allowed a substitute FT was correct has no bearing on the classification of the FT as merited.
The bottom line is that no rule was inadvertently set aside, a call was simply missed. Therefore, this is not a correctable error situation.
Edited for the sanity of Mr. Spelling Guy.
[Edited by Nevadaref on Nov 8th, 2005 at 11:49 PM]