|
How about visual?
From SDS - (yes, this was his entire post)
Rule 7.09(l)-casebook interpretation.
My response -
7.09 is a good start (I'm not sure what an OBR Case Book is, but I digress).
Did you happen to notice the caps and separation of words? How about the article, that implies a separate entity. I didn't think I would have to give a grammar lesson, on top of clarifying the interference/obstruction issue.
Even SDS came back and used the same style when referencing it. He has a history of supplying incmplete answers or things that are easily misinterpreted and need further information. (see: Lawmaker wants to tax umpires)His post required further substance since newer umpires could easily misinterpret it. Please show me the (another article, watch out) OBR Case Book and I will apologize.
C'mon, Rich - you didn't blow the call that badly, did you? Name calling, bad judgement and poor reading skills; boy, I missed you.
[Edited by WhatWuzThatBlue on Nov 2nd, 2005 at 06:56 PM]
|