|
Ah HA!
WCB wrote:
"Yet, a few days ago, you cried that umpires need to make the expected call (even though the rule book says differently) because the interpreter/assignor/coach demands it.
"Okay...which side are you on here?
The rule book does not specifically mention this play. It was highlighted in a ten year old newsletter and that is your justification. We have very similar plays that permit this type of behavior. You choose to ignore the correlation."
------------
The perfect defense when you are caught with your pants down . . .
Appropriate for the Halloween Season:
A bit of Léger Maine and misdirection huh WC . . . as a tribute to Harry Houdini --
"LOOK, look here . . . while I slip this rabbit into my hat . . . WA LA . . . a rabbit from my magic top hat."
WCB, the count against you got so heavy you went for the old misdirection play huh?
Sorry, try to change the subject doesn't work with the astute readers of officiating.com (well perhaps it would work with PWL),the evidence is too strong against ya man . . . but again,
Have a great Halloween Season.
T
|