Quote:
Originally posted by M&M Guy
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
As they say, when in Rome...
|
Was Rome full of @ssholes?
|
Depends on what county of Rome we're talking about. [/quote][/b]
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Bob, normally I wouldn't say anything but I actually took the time to look this up dammit, so we're all gonna get it right!
According to the chart in Appendix IV simultaneous T's carry their own penalty. Double T's are merely POI, no shots. By definition this cannot be double T's. The false double T does carry the same penalty as the simultaneous T's. In the original sitch the two Ts are simultaneous, not false double, by definition.
The proper procedure is each team gets 2 FTs for the T's, A gets the ball at the midline due to the intentional T. If A was in the bonus on the *original* foul then A shoots their 1&1.
|
Ok, here is where the fun ensues...
I'm sure we all appreciate the time you took out of your busy day to actually look this up,
... but, in a game situation where I picture this happening, I don't know if I want to try to explain to everyone the subtle differences between simultaneous T's, double T's, false double T's, intentional T's, etc. As Dewey1 mentioned, it was easy to explain the double T's, everyone got what happened and how it was administered. There may be times where the subtle distinctions do make a difference, but in this case, doesn't it make sense to handle it as it was? [/B][/QUOTE]
Most of the time, yes.
But since I have this test to take I don't care right now about the best way, the easiest way, the smartest way or any other way except the correct way by rule. And I already learned something: this year, they want us to use the 2006 book! NOT the 2005 book! Cool, eh?