Thread: usc vs. nd
View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 20, 2005, 02:19am
JugglingReferee JugglingReferee is offline
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
I don't think the problem is so much with changing a call. Obviously, this is one that you want to SELL, but you want to get it right in the end.
Yes, we want to get it right in the end. That's why we have IR. Sure the HL should sell the call. (Did he?)

Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
If Weis's quote is accurate, then I think the bigger problem is how the R explained this - that the official "changed his mind." That makes it sound like the forward/backward fumble is an arbitrary decision and the HL is pulling it from his a**.
Which Weis quote are you talking about? I think you might mean the claim Weis made about the R's comments of the HL changing his mind.

Granted the R should have used different language, such as "re-evaluated what happened," "accepted definite knowledge from other officials," etc... but I'm not sure about the fumble's direction decision being arbitrary. I think at the time the HL made the call he thought was right at the time.

I don't think the HL pulled the call from his a$$. I think he was unprepared for the situation. He did not rise to being a great official.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote