View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 18, 2005, 04:21pm
Jurassic Referee Jurassic Referee is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Re: Re: Re: have to agree

Quote:
Originally posted by M&M Guy
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Iow, my recollection might be wrong
Why wouldn't it apply to one opponent? I'm not saying this to be argumentative (this time), but isn't the wording "opponents" just to let you know it can include more than one, instead of excluding only one? I remember they added the interp on B1 guarding A1, B2 comes up and guards, then B1 leaves, and A1 could still be called for the 5-sec. violation because they were closely guarded for 3 sec. by B1 and then 2 sec. by B2. Could that be the interp you were thinking of?
Nope, but thanks for asking.

I think that the case play applies to one screener also. I ain't definitely sure though that it does. I also vaguely remember something like the handout that BJ is talking about above too. Add in the fact that I've been wrong on rules interpretations before and that I'm still learning too, you get........uncertainty (I guess is the best word) on my part.
Reply With Quote