View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 16, 2005, 07:03pm
Theisey Theisey is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 1,464
Quote:
Originally posted by Gman34
Theisey, He said that K blocked R2 into R1 not R2 blocking K into R1. Do you still have K ball?
Yes, K gets the ball.

My statement was "Contact is exempted for K when R blocks K into the receiver not the other way around".
R blocking K into the R receiver is not a KCI foul. That was more of a rule statement of fact.

The "not the other way around" part means K blocking R into R's own receiver is NOT a KCI foul against K.

I think we are all on the same page here.

Reply With Quote