View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 16, 2005, 01:02am
tempestos tempestos is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 35
We were having a little debate last night and I was wondering if anyone had any official interpretation material on this issue.

Rule 9-5-1d states that it is unsportsmanlike conduct for B to use "disconcerting acts or words prior to the snap in an attempt to interfere with A’s signals or movements."

My question is what is considered a "disconcerting act" as opposed to "word." Can it encompass physical acts meant to draw the offense into a false start (e.g., running at the line and stopping before the neutral zone), or is it limited to cadence issues.

As a follow-up to this question, is there ever a foul against B for acting in a manner meant to draw A players into a false start?
Reply With Quote