View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 15, 2005, 10:11pm
rainmaker rainmaker is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Again, this question is completely stoopid. There is NO definitive answer to it. Just opinions.
It's also stoopid question because it's not likely to happen. Even if there is a rules reference for this, it's not something anyone needs to know.
You never know when a real life situation will come up though.
Yea, I guess. I just think that the time it takes to construct a test, and the time spent by the test-takers in studying and then "writing" the test is better spent on situations that are more likely to occur. It just seems incredibly foolhardy to expect people to bone up on these kinds of things when there are real issues that need addressing, such as the ins and outs of the backcourt violation, and the ups and downs of travelling.
Reply With Quote